File Manager
Upload
Current Directory: /home/lartcid/public_html/journal.lartc.id
[Back]
..
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
.htaccess
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
.well-known
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
README.md
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
api
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
cache
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
cgi-bin
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
classes
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
config.TEMPLATE.inc.php
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
config.inc.php
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
controllers
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
cypress.json
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
dbscripts
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
docs
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
error_log
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
favicon.ico
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
index.php
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
js
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
lib
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
locale
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
mini.php
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
pages
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
php.ini
[Edit]
Hapus
Rename
plugins
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
public
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
registry
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
scheduledTaskLogs
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
schemas
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
styles
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
templates
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
tools
[Open]
Hapus
Rename
Edit File
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set ver.3.3.5 # Copyright (c) 2006-2020 Trustwave and contributors. All rights reserved. # Copyright (c) 2021-2023 Core Rule Set project. All rights reserved. # # The OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set is distributed under # Apache Software License (ASL) version 2 # Please see the enclosed LICENSE file for full details. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # # Some protocol violations are common in application layer attacks. # Validating HTTP requests eliminates a large number of application layer attacks. # # The purpose of this rules file is to enforce HTTP RFC requirements that state how # the client is supposed to interact with the server. # https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html # # -= Paranoia Level 0 (empty) =- (apply unconditionally) # SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 1" "id:920011,phase:1,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 1" "id:920012,phase:2,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" # # -= Paranoia Level 1 (default) =- (apply only when tx.executing_paranoia_level is sufficiently high: 1 or higher) # # # Validate request line against the format specified in the HTTP RFC # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # # Uses rule negation against the regex for positive security. The regex specifies the proper # construction of URI request lines such as: # # "http:" "//" host [ ":" port ] [ abs_path [ "?" query ]] # # It also outlines proper construction for CONNECT, OPTIONS and GET requests. # # -=[ References ]=- # https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.1 # http://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/272.html # SecRule REQUEST_LINE "!@rx ^(?i:(?:[a-z]{3,10}\s+(?:\w{3,7}?://[\w\-\./]*(?::\d+)?)?/[^?#]*(?:\?[^#\s]*)?(?:#[\S]*)?|connect (?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\.?(?::\d+)?|options \*)\s+[\w\./]+|get /[^?#]*(?:\?[^#\s]*)?(?:#[\S]*)?)$" \ "id:920100,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Invalid HTTP Request Line',\ logdata:'%{request_line}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Identify multipart/form-data name evasion attempts # # There are possible impedance mismatches between how # ModSecurity interprets multipart file names and how # a destination app server such as PHP might parse the # Content-Disposition data: # # filename-parm := "filename" "=" value # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # These rules check for the existence of the ' " ; = meta-characters in # either the file or file name variables. # HTML entities may lead to false positives, why they are allowed on PL1. # Negative look behind assertions allow frequently used entities &_; # # -=[ Targets, characters and html entities ]=- # # 920120: PL1 : FILES_NAMES, FILES # ['\";=] but allowed: # &[aAoOuUyY]uml); &[aAeEiIoOuU]circ; &[eEiIoOuUyY]acute; # &[aAeEiIoOuU]grave; &[cC]cedil; &[aAnNoO]tilde; & ' # # 920121: PL2 : FILES_NAMES, FILES # ['\";=] : ' " ; = meta-characters # # Not supported by re2 (?<!re). # # -=[ References ]=- # https://www.owasp.org/index.php/ModSecurity_CRS_RuleID-960000 # http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2183.txt # SecRule FILES_NAMES|FILES "@rx (?<!&(?:[aAoOuUyY]uml)|&(?:[aAeEiIoOuU]circ)|&(?:[eEiIoOuUyY]acute)|&(?:[aAeEiIoOuU]grave)|&(?:[cC]cedil)|&(?:[aAnNoO]tilde)|&(?:amp)|&(?:apos));|['\"=]" \ "id:920120,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Attempted multipart/form-data bypass',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Accept only digits in content length # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule uses ModSecurity's rule negation against the regex meaning if the Content-Length header # is NOT all digits, then it will match. # # -=[ References ]=- # https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.13 # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "!@rx ^\d+$" \ "id:920160,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Content-Length HTTP header is not numeric',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Do not accept GET or HEAD requests with bodies # HTTP standard allows GET requests to have a body but this # feature is not used in real life. Attackers could try to force # a request body on an unsuspecting web applications. # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This is a chained rule that first checks the Request Method. If it is a # GET or HEAD method, then it checks for the existence of a Content-Length # header. If the header exists and its payload is either not a 0 digit or not # empty, then it will match. # # -=[ References ]=- # https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.3 # SecRule REQUEST_METHOD "@rx ^(?:GET|HEAD)$" \ "id:920170,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'GET or HEAD Request with Body Content',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "!@rx ^0?$" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # This is a sibling of rule 920170 # SecRule REQUEST_METHOD "@rx ^(?:GET|HEAD)$" \ "id:920171,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'GET or HEAD Request with Transfer-Encoding',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Transfer-Encoding "!@eq 0" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Require Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding to be provided with # every POST request if the protocol version is not HTTP/2. # # In case of HTTP/2, see the RFC7540 8.1 p52: # HTTP/2 does not use the Transfer-Encoding: chunked anymore, because # the underlying transport protocol is already using data frames with # known length. # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This chained rule checks if the protocol is not HTTP/2, then checks # request method is POST, if so, it checks that a Content-Length or # Transfer-Encoding headers are also present. # SecRule REQUEST_PROTOCOL "!@within HTTP/2 HTTP/2.0" \ "id:920180,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'POST without Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding headers',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_METHOD "@streq POST" \ "chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "@eq 0" \ "chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Transfer-Encoding "@eq 0" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # As per RFC7230 3.3.2: A sender MUST NOT send a Content-Length # header field in any message that contains a Transfer-Encoding header # field. # # Related to 920170, 920171 and 920180. # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Transfer-Encoding "!@eq 0" \ "id:920181,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers present.',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "!@eq 0" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Range Header Check # # RFC7233 2.1 p6: # "A byte-range-spec is invalid if the last-byte-pos value is present # and less than the first-byte-pos." # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule compares the first and second byte ranges and flags # when the first value is greater than the second. # # -=[ References ]=- # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7233 # https://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Aug/175 # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Range|REQUEST_HEADERS:Request-Range "@rx (\d+)-(\d+)" \ "id:920190,\ phase:2,\ block,\ capture,\ t:none,\ msg:'Range: Invalid Last Byte Value',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule TX:2 "@lt %{tx.1}" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Broken/Malicious clients often have duplicate or conflicting headers # Automated programs and bots often do not obey the HTTP RFC # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule inspects the Connection header and looks for duplicates of the # keep-alive and close options. # # -=[ References ]=- # http://www.bad-behavior.ioerror.us/about/ # https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7233 # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Connection "@rx \b(?:keep-alive|close),\s?(?:keep-alive|close)\b" \ "id:920210,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Multiple/Conflicting Connection Header Data Found',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Check URL encodings # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # There are two different chained rules. We need to separate them as we are inspecting two # different variables - REQUEST_URI and REQUEST_BODY. For REQUEST_BODY, we only want to # run the @validateUrlEncoding operator if the content-type is application/x-www-form-urlencoding. # # -=[ References ]=- # http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt # # -=[ Example payload ]=- # http://localhost/?s=a%20b%20c%'/ # reason: %'/ is not a valid url encoding # SecRule REQUEST_URI "@rx \x25" \ "id:920220,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'URL Encoding Abuse Attack Attempt',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153/267/72',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_URI "@validateUrlEncoding" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@rx ^(?i)application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \ "id:920240,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'URL Encoding Abuse Attack Attempt',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153/267/72',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_BODY "@rx \x25" \ "chain" SecRule REQUEST_BODY "@validateUrlEncoding" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Check UTF encoding # We only want to apply this check if UTF-8 encoding is actually used by the site, otherwise # it will result in false positives. # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This chained rule first checks to see if the admin has set the TX:CRS_VALIDATE_UTF8_ENCODING # variable in the crs-setup.conf file. # SecRule TX:CRS_VALIDATE_UTF8_ENCODING "@eq 1" \ "id:920250,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'UTF8 Encoding Abuse Attack Attempt',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153/267',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME|ARGS|ARGS_NAMES "@validateUtf8Encoding" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Disallow use of full-width unicode as decoding evasions may be possible. # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule looks for full-width encoding by looking for %u followed by 2 'f' # characters and then 2 hex characters. It is a vulnerability that affected # IIS circa 2007. # The rule will trigger on %uXXXX formatted chars that are full or half # width, as explained above. This %uXXXX format is passed as a raw parameter # and is (seemingly only) accepted by IIS (5.0, 6.0, 7.0, and 8.0). Other # webservers will only process unicode chars presented as hex UTF-8 bytes. # # -=[ References ]=- # http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/739224 # https://www.checkpoint.com/defense/advisories/public/2007/cpai-2007-201.html # https://github.com/SpiderLabs/owasp-modsecurity-crs/issues/719 # SecRule REQUEST_URI|REQUEST_BODY "@rx \%u[fF]{2}[0-9a-fA-F]{2}" \ "id:920260,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Unicode Full/Half Width Abuse Attack Attempt',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-iis',\ tag:'platform-windows',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153/267/72',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict type of characters sent # # This is a rule with multiple stricter siblings that grows more # restrictive in higher paranoia levels. # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule uses the @validateByteRange operator to restrict the request # payloads. # # -=[ Targets and ASCII Ranges ]=- # # 920270: PL1 : REQUEST_URI, REQUEST_HEADERS, ARGS and ARGS_NAMES # ASCII 1-255 : Full ASCII range without null character # # 920271: PL2 : REQUEST_URI, REQUEST_HEADERS, ARGS and ARGS_NAMES # ASCII 9,10,13,32-126,128-255 : Full visible ASCII range, tab, newline # # 920272: PL3 : REQUEST_URI, REQUEST_HEADERS, ARGS, ARGS_NAMES and REQUEST_BODY # ASCII 32-36,38-126 : Visible lower ASCII range without percent symbol # # 920273: PL4 : ARGS, ARGS_NAMES and REQUEST_BODY # ASCII 38,44-46,48-58,61,65-90,95,97-122 # A-Z a-z 0-9 = - _ . , : & # # 920274: PL4 : REQUEST_HEADERS without User-Agent, Referer and Cookie # ASCII 32,34,38,42-59,61,65-90,95,97-122 # A-Z a-z 0-9 = - _ . , : & " * + / SPACE # # REQUEST_URI and REQUEST_HEADERS User-Agent, Referer and Cookie are very hard # to restrict beyond the limits in 920272. # # 920274 generally has few positives. However, it would detect rare attacks # on Accept request headers and friends. SecRule REQUEST_URI|REQUEST_HEADERS|ARGS|ARGS_NAMES "@validateByteRange 1-255" \ "id:920270,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Invalid character in request (null character)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Do not accept requests without common headers. # All normal web browsers include Host, User-Agent and Accept headers. # Implies either an attacker or a legitimate automation client. # # # Missing/Empty Host Header # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # These rules will first check to see if a Host header is present. # The second check is to see if a Host header exists but is empty. # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Host "@eq 0" \ "id:920280,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request Missing a Host Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}',\ skipAfter:END-HOST-CHECK" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Host "@rx ^$" \ "id:920290,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Empty Host Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" SecMarker "END-HOST-CHECK" # # Empty Accept Header # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule checks if an Accept header exists, but has an empty value. # This is only allowed in combination with the OPTIONS method. # Additionally, there are some clients sending empty Accept headers. # They are covered in another chained rule checking the User-Agent. # This technique demands a separate rule to detect an empty # Accept header if there is no user agent. This is checked via # the separate rule 920311. # # Exclude some common broken clients sending empty Accept header: # "Business/6.6.1.2 CFNetwork/758.5.3 Darwin/15.6.0" (CRS issue #515) # "Entreprise/6.5.0.177 CFNetwork/758.4.3 Darwin/15.5.0" (CRS issue #366) # # -=[ References ]=- # https://github.com/SpiderLabs/owasp-modsecurity-crs/issues/366 # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Accept "@rx ^$" \ "id:920310,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request Has an Empty Accept Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'NOTICE',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_METHOD "!@rx ^OPTIONS$" \ "chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent "!@pm AppleWebKit Android Business Enterprise Entreprise" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.notice_anomaly_score}'" # # This rule is a sibling of rule 920310. # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Accept "@rx ^$" \ "id:920311,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request Has an Empty Accept Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'NOTICE',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_METHOD "!@rx ^OPTIONS$" \ "chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent "@eq 0" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.notice_anomaly_score}'" # # Empty User-Agent Header # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rules will check to see if the User-Agent header is empty. # # Note that there is a second rule, 920320, which will check for # the existence of the User-Agent header. # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent "@rx ^$" \ "id:920330,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Empty User Agent Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'NOTICE',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.notice_anomaly_score}'" # # Missing Content-Type Header with Request Body # # -=[ Rule Logic]=- # This rule will first check to see if the value of the Content-Length header is # non-equal to 0. The chained rule is then checking the existence of the # Content-Type header. The RFCs do not state there must be a # Content-Type header. However, a request missing a Content-Header is a # strong indication of a non-compliant browser. # # Also, omitting the CT header allows to bypass the Request Body Processor # unless you set the optional tx.enforce_bodyproc_urlencoded variable. # # Note: in default settings, this behavior only provides a NOTICE and will # not cause a request to be blocked. However, in paranoia level 2 or # higher, we run sibling 920341, which DOES block these requests. # # -=[ References ]=- # http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html#header.content-type SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "!@rx ^0$" \ "id:920340,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request Containing Content, but Missing Content-Type header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'NOTICE',\ chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@eq 0" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.notice_anomaly_score}'" # Check that the host header is not an IP address # This is not an HTTP RFC violation but it is indicative of automated client access. # Many web-based worms propagate by scanning IP address blocks. # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule triggers if the Host header contains all digits (and possible port) # # -=[ References ]=- # https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2005.01.hackerbasher.aspx # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Host "@rx ^[\d.:]+$" \ "id:920350,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Host header is a numeric IP address',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # In most cases, you should expect a certain volume of each a request on your # website. For example, a request with 400 arguments, can be suspicious. # This file creates limitations on the request. # # TODO Look at the rules in this file, and define the sizes you'd like to enforce. # Note that most of the rules are commented out by default. # Uncomment the rules you need # # # Maximum number of arguments in request limited # SecRule &TX:MAX_NUM_ARGS "@eq 1" \ "id:920380,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Too many arguments in request',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule &ARGS "@gt %{tx.max_num_args}" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" ## -- Arguments limits -- # # Limit argument name length # SecRule &TX:ARG_NAME_LENGTH "@eq 1" \ "id:920360,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Argument name too long',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule ARGS_NAMES "@gt %{tx.arg_name_length}" \ "t:none,t:length,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Limit argument value length # # This rule is also triggered by an Apache Struts Remote Code Execution exploit: # [ Apache Struts vulnerability CVE-2017-9791 - Exploit tested: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/42324 ] # SecRule &TX:ARG_LENGTH "@eq 1" \ "id:920370,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Argument value too long',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule ARGS "@gt %{tx.arg_length}" \ "t:none,t:length,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Limit arguments total length # SecRule &TX:TOTAL_ARG_LENGTH "@eq 1" \ "id:920390,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Total arguments size exceeded',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule ARGS_COMBINED_SIZE "@gt %{tx.total_arg_length}" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # -- File upload limits -- # # Individual file size is limited SecRule &TX:MAX_FILE_SIZE "@eq 1" \ "id:920400,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Uploaded file size too large',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@rx ^(?i)multipart/form-data" \ "chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "@gt %{tx.max_file_size}" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Combined file size is limited # SecRule &TX:COMBINED_FILE_SIZES "@eq 1" \ "id:920410,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Total uploaded files size too large',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule FILES_COMBINED_SIZE "@gt %{tx.combined_file_sizes}" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict which content-types we accept. # # Restrict Content-Type header to established patterns. # # This provides generic whitelist protection against vulnerabilities like # Apache Struts Content-Type arbitrary command execution (CVE-2017-5638). # # Examples of allowed patterns: # - text/plain # - text/plain; charset="UTF-8" # - multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundary12345 # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "!@rx ^[\w/.+-]+(?:\s?;\s?(?:action|boundary|charset|type|start(?:-info)?)\s?=\s?['\"\w.()+,/:=?<>@-]+)*$" \ "id:920470,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,t:lowercase,\ msg:'Illegal Content-Type header',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153',\ tag:'PCI/12.1',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # In case Content-Type header can be parsed, check the mime-type against # the policy defined in the 'allowed_request_content_type' variable. # To change your policy, edit crs-setup.conf and activate rule 900220. SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@rx ^[^;\s]+" \ "id:920420,\ phase:2,\ block,\ capture,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request content type is not allowed by policy',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153',\ tag:'PCI/12.1',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.content_type=|%{tx.0}|',\ chain" SecRule TX:content_type "!@within %{tx.allowed_request_content_type}" \ "t:lowercase,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict charset parameter within the content-type header # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@rx charset\s*=\s*[\"']?([^;\"'\s]+)" \ "id:920480,\ phase:1,\ block,\ capture,\ t:none,t:lowercase,\ msg:'Request content type charset is not allowed by policy',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153',\ tag:'PCI/12.1',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule TX:1 "!@rx ^%{tx.allowed_request_content_type_charset}$" \ "t:none,\ ctl:forceRequestBodyVariable=On,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict charset parameter inside content type header to occur max once. # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@rx charset.*?charset" \ "id:920530,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,t:lowercase,\ msg:'Multiple charsets detected in content type header',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153',\ tag:'PCI/12.1',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict protocol versions. # SecRule REQUEST_PROTOCOL "!@within %{tx.allowed_http_versions}" \ "id:920430,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'HTTP protocol version is not allowed by policy',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict file extension # SecRule REQUEST_BASENAME "@rx \.([^.]+)$" \ "id:920440,\ phase:2,\ block,\ capture,\ t:none,\ msg:'URL file extension is restricted by policy',\ logdata:'%{TX.0}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.extension=.%{tx.1}/',\ chain" SecRule TX:EXTENSION "@within %{tx.restricted_extensions}" \ "t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,t:lowercase,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Backup or "working" file extension # example: index.php~, /index.php~/foo/ # SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME "@rx \.[^.~]+~(?:/.*|)$" \ "id:920500,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Attempt to access a backup or working file',\ logdata:'%{TX.0}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restricted HTTP headers # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # The use of certain headers is restricted. They are listed in the variable # TX.restricted_headers. # # The headers are transformed into lowercase before the match. In order to # make sure that only complete header names are matching, the names in # TX.restricted_headers are wrapped in slashes. This guarantees that the # header Range (-> /range/) is not matching the restricted header # /content-range/ for example. # # This is a chained rule, where the first rule fills a set of variables of the # form TX.header_name_<HEADER_NAME>. The second rule is then executed for all # variables of the form TX.header_name_<HEADER_NAME>. # # As a consequence of the construction of the rule, the alert message and the # alert data will not display the original header name Content-Range, but # /content-range/ instead. # # # -=[ References ]=- # https://access.redhat.com/security/vulnerabilities/httpoxy (Header Proxy) # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS_NAMES "@rx ^.*$" \ "id:920450,\ phase:2,\ block,\ capture,\ t:none,t:lowercase,\ msg:'HTTP header is restricted by policy (%{MATCHED_VAR})',\ logdata:'Restricted header detected: %{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/12.1',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.header_name_%{tx.0}=/%{tx.0}/',\ chain" SecRule TX:/^header_name_/ "@within %{tx.restricted_headers}" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Restrict response charsets that we allow. # The following rules make sure that the response will be in an ASCII-compatible charset that # phase 4 rules can properly understand and block. # # # Some servers rely on the request Accept header to determine what charset to respond with. # This rule restricts these to familiar charsets. # # Regular expression generated from util/regexp-assemble/data/920600.data. # To update the regular expression run the following shell script # (consult util/regexp-assemble/README.md for details): # util/regexp-assemble/regexp-assemble.py update 920600 # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Accept "!@rx ^(?:(?:\*|[^\"(),\/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]+)\/(?:\*|[^\"(),\/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]+))(?:\s*+;\s*+(?:(?:charset\s*+=\s*+(?:\"?(?:iso-8859-15?|windows-1252|utf-8)\b\"?))|(?:(?:c(?:h(?:a(?:r(?:s(?:e[^t\"(),\/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]|[^e\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^s\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^r\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^a\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^h\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^c\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])[^\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]*(?:)\s*+=\s*+[^(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]+)|;?))*(?:\s*+,\s*+(?:(?:\*|[^\"(),\/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]+)\/(?:\*|[^\"(),\/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]+))(?:\s*+;\s*+(?:(?:charset\s*+=\s*+(?:\"?(?:iso-8859-15?|windows-1252|utf-8)\b\"?))|(?:(?:c(?:h(?:a(?:r(?:s(?:e[^t\"(),\/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]|[^e\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^s\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^r\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^a\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^h\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])|[^c\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}])[^\"(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]*(?:)\s*+=\s*+[^(),/:;<=>?![\x5c\]{}]+)|;?))*)*$" \ "id:920600,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,t:lowercase,\ msg:'Illegal Accept header: charset parameter',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # The following rule (920620) checks for the presence of 2 or more request Content-Type headers. # Content-Type confusion poses a significant security risk to a web application. It occurs when # the server and client have different interpretations of the Content-Type header, leading to # miscommunication, potential exploitation and WAF bypass. # # Using Apache, when multiple Content-Type request headers are received, the server combines them # into a single header with the values separated by commas. For example, if a client sends multiple # Content-Type headers with values "application/json" and "text/plain", Apache will combine them # into a single header like this: "Content-Type: application/json, text/plain". # # On the other hand, Nginx handles multiple Content-Type headers differently. It preserves each # header as a separate entity without combining them. So, if a client sends multiple Content-Type # headers, Nginx will keep them separate, maintaining the original values. # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@gt 1" \ "id:920620,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Multiple Content-Type Request Headers',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/1',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl1=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 2" "id:920013,phase:1,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 2" "id:920014,phase:2,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" # # -= Paranoia Level 2 =- (apply only when tx.executing_paranoia_level is sufficiently high: 2 or higher) # # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # # Check the number of range fields in the Range request header. # # An excessive number of Range request headers can be used to DoS a server. # The original CVE proposed an arbitrary upper limit of 5 range fields. # # Several clients are known to request PDF fields with up to 62 range # fields. Therefore the standard rule does not cover PDF files. This is # performed in two separate (stricter) siblings of this rule. # # 920200: PL2: Limit of 5 range header fields for all filenames outside of PDFs # 920201: PL2: Limit of 62 range header fields for PDFs # 920202: PL4: Limit of 5 range header fields for PDFs # # -=[ References ]=- # https://httpd.apache.org/security/CVE-2011-3192.txt SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Range|REQUEST_HEADERS:Request-Range "@rx ^bytes=(?:(?:\d+)?-(?:\d+)?\s*,?\s*){6}" \ "id:920200,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Range: Too many fields (6 or more)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_BASENAME "!@endsWith .pdf" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # This is a sibling of rule 920200 # SecRule REQUEST_BASENAME "@endsWith .pdf" \ "id:920201,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Range: Too many fields for pdf request (63 or more)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Range|REQUEST_HEADERS:Request-Range "@rx ^bytes=(?:(?:\d+)?-(?:\d+)?\s*,?\s*){63}" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" SecRule ARGS "@rx %[0-9a-fA-F]{2}" \ "id:920230,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Multiple URL Encoding Detected',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/255/153/267/120',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # Missing Accept Header # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule generates a notice if the Accept header is missing. # # Notice: The rule tries to avoid known false positives by ignoring # OPTIONS requests coming from known offending User-Agents via two # chained rules. # As ModSecurity only reports the match of the last matching rule, # the alert is misleading. # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Accept "@eq 0" \ "id:920300,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request Missing an Accept Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'NOTICE',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_METHOD "!@rx ^OPTIONS$" \ "chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent "!@pm AppleWebKit Android" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.notice_anomaly_score}'" # # PL2: This is a stricter sibling of 920270. # SecRule REQUEST_URI|REQUEST_HEADERS|ARGS|ARGS_NAMES "@validateByteRange 9,10,13,32-126,128-255" \ "id:920271,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Invalid character in request (non printable characters)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Missing User-Agent Header # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rules will check to see if there is a User-Agent header or not. # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent "@eq 0" \ "id:920320,\ phase:2,\ pass,\ t:none,\ msg:'Missing User Agent Header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'PCI/6.5.10',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'NOTICE',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.notice_anomaly_score}'" # # PL2: This is a stricter sibling of 920120. # SecRule FILES_NAMES|FILES "@rx ['\";=]" \ "id:920121,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Attempted multipart/form-data bypass',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # PL2: Block on Missing Content-Type Header with Request Body # This is a stricter sibling of rule 920340. # # -=[ References ]=- # http://httpwg.org/specs/rfc7231.html#header.content-type SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Length "!@rx ^0$" \ "id:920341,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request Containing Content Requires Content-Type header',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/2',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Content-Type "@eq 0" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl2=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 3" "id:920015,phase:1,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 3" "id:920016,phase:2,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" # # -= Paranoia Level 3 =- (apply only when tx.executing_paranoia_level is sufficiently high: 3 or higher) # # # PL 3: This is a stricter sibling of 920270. Ascii range: Printable characters in the low range # # This rule is also triggered by the following exploit(s): # [ SAP CRM Java vulnerability CVE-2018-2380 - Exploit tested: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44292 ] # SecRule REQUEST_URI|REQUEST_HEADERS|ARGS|ARGS_NAMES|REQUEST_BODY "@validateByteRange 32-36,38-126" \ "id:920272,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Invalid character in request (outside of printable chars below ascii 127)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/3',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl3=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # PL3: The little known x-up-devcap-post-charset request header can be used to submit # a request with a different encoding as an alternative to the charset parameter in # the Content-Type header. This can be used to circumvent charset restrictions on # the Content-Type header in ASP.NET. # Note that this only works in combination with a User-Agent prefix. # # This rule is based on a blog post by Soroush Dalili at # https://soroush.secproject.com/blog/2019/05/x-up-devcap-post-charset-header-in-aspnet-to-bypass-wafs-again/ # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:x-up-devcap-post-charset "@ge 1" \ "id:920490,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Request header x-up-devcap-post-charset detected in combination with prefix \'UP\' to User-Agent',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'language-aspnet',\ tag:'platform-windows',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/3',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent "@rx ^(?i)up" \ "t:none,\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl3=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # Cache-Control Request Header whitelist # # -=[ Rule Logic ]=- # This rule aims to strictly whitelist the Cache-Control request header # values and to blocks all violations. This should be useful to intercept # "bad bot" and tools that impersonate a real browser but with wrong request # header setup. # # The regular expression used on this rule tries to match multiple directives # in a single value, for example: "max-stale=1, max-age=2". This leads us to # use a regular expression that accepts a trailing comma to keep compatibility # with all regex engines and not PCRE only. For example: "max-stale=1, max-age=2, " # # Moreover, this regular expression allows duplicate directives sequence like: # "max-stale, max-stale=1, no-cache, no-cache". # # Standard Cache-Control directives that can be used by the client: # - max-age=<seconds> # - max-stale[=<seconds>] # - min-fresh=<seconds> # - no-cache # - no-store # - no-transform # - only-if-cached # # References: # - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cache-Control # - https://regex101.com/r/CZ0Hxu/22 # SecRule &REQUEST_HEADERS:Cache-Control "@gt 0" \ "id:920510,\ phase:1,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Invalid Cache-Control request header',\ logdata:'Invalid Cache-Control value in request found within %{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}: %{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'header-whitelist',\ tag:'paranoia-level/3',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Cache-Control "!@rx ^(?:(?:max-age=[0-9]+|min-fresh=[0-9]+|no-cache|no-store|no-transform|only-if-cached|max-stale(?:=[0-9]+)?)(\s*\,\s*|$)){1,7}$" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl3=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 4" "id:920017,phase:1,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" SecRule TX:EXECUTING_PARANOIA_LEVEL "@lt 4" "id:920018,phase:2,pass,nolog,skipAfter:END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT" # # -= Paranoia Level 4 =- (apply only when tx.executing_paranoia_level is sufficiently high: 4 or higher) # # # This is a stricter sibling of rule 920200 # SecRule REQUEST_BASENAME "@endsWith .pdf" \ "id:920202,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,\ msg:'Range: Too many fields for pdf request (6 or more)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/4',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'WARNING',\ chain" SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Range|REQUEST_HEADERS:Request-Range "@rx ^bytes=(?:(?:\d+)?-(?:\d+)?\s*,?\s*){6}" \ "setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl4=+%{tx.warning_anomaly_score}'" # # This is a stricter sibling of 920270. # # This rule is also triggered by the following exploit(s): # [ SAP CRM Java vulnerability CVE-2018-2380 - Exploit tested: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44292 ] # SecRule ARGS|ARGS_NAMES|REQUEST_BODY "@validateByteRange 38,44-46,48-58,61,65-90,95,97-122" \ "id:920273,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Invalid character in request (outside of very strict set)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/4',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl4=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # This is a stricter sibling of 920270. # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS|!REQUEST_HEADERS:User-Agent|!REQUEST_HEADERS:Referer|!REQUEST_HEADERS:Cookie|!REQUEST_HEADERS:Sec-Fetch-User "@validateByteRange 32,34,38,42-59,61,65-90,95,97-122" \ "id:920274,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Invalid character in request headers (outside of very strict set)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/4',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl4=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # This is a stricter sibling of 920270. # The 'Sec-Fetch-User' header may contain the '?' (63) character. # Therefore we exclude this header from rule 920274 which forbids '?'. # https://www.w3.org/TR/fetch-metadata/#http-headerdef-sec-fetch-user # SecRule REQUEST_HEADERS:Sec-Fetch-User "@validateByteRange 32,34,38,42-59,61,63,65-90,95,97-122" \ "id:920275,\ phase:2,\ block,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,\ msg:'Invalid character in request headers (outside of very strict set)',\ logdata:'%{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}=%{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/210/272',\ tag:'paranoia-level/4',\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl4=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # -=[ Abnormal Character Escapes ]=- # # [ Rule Logic ] # Consider the following payload: arg=cat+/e\tc/pa\ssw\d # Here, \s and \d were only used to obfuscate the string passwd and a lot of # parsers will silently ignore the non-necessary escapes. The case with \t is # a bit different though, as \t is a natural escape for the TAB character, # so we will avoid this (and \n, \r, etc.). # # This rule aims to detect non-necessary, abnormal escapes. You could say it is # a nice way to forbid the backslash character where it is not needed. # # This is a new rule at paranoia level 4. We expect quite a few false positives # for this rule and we will later evaluate if the rule makes any sense at all. # The rule is redundant with 920273 and 920274 in PL4. But if the rule proofs # to be useful and false positives remain at a reasonable level, then it might # be shifted to PL3 in a future release, where it would be the only rule # covering the backslash escape. # # We forbid backslashes followed by a list of basic ascii characters - unless # the backslash is preceded by another backslash. # # This rule is also triggered by the following exploit(s): # [ SAP CRM Java vulnerability CVE-2018-2380 - Exploit tested: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44292 ] # SecRule REQUEST_URI|REQUEST_HEADERS|ARGS|ARGS_NAMES "@rx (?:^|[^\\\\])\\\\[cdeghijklmpqwxyz123456789]" \ "id:920460,\ phase:2,\ block,\ capture,\ t:none,t:urlDecodeUni,t:htmlEntityDecode,t:lowercase,\ log,\ msg:'Abnormal character escapes in request',\ logdata:'Matched Data: %{TX.0} found within %{MATCHED_VAR_NAME}: %{MATCHED_VAR}',\ tag:'application-multi',\ tag:'language-multi',\ tag:'platform-multi',\ tag:'attack-protocol',\ tag:'paranoia-level/4',\ tag:'OWASP_CRS',\ tag:'capec/1000/153/267',\ ctl:auditLogParts=+E,\ ver:'OWASP_CRS/3.3.5',\ severity:'CRITICAL',\ setvar:'tx.http_violation_score=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}',\ setvar:'tx.anomaly_score_pl4=+%{tx.critical_anomaly_score}'" # # -= Paranoia Levels Finished =- # SecMarker "END-REQUEST-920-PROTOCOL-ENFORCEMENT"
Simpan